ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE
Cultural De-colonization versus Liberal Approaches to Abortion in Africa: The Politics of Representation and Voice
Malvern, Chiweshe1* and Catriona Macleod2
African-based Post-doctoral Fellow for the London School of Economics and a Research Associate at the Critical Studies in Sexualities and Reproduction Research Programme at Rhodes University, Grahamstown, South Africa1; Distinguished Professor of Psychology and SARChI chair of the Critical Studies in Sexualities and Reproduction Research Programme at Rhodes University, Grahamstown, South Africa2
*For Correspondence: Email: firstname.lastname@example.org; Phone: +27612933630
Political discussions on abortion in Africa take place in the context of most countries having restrictive abortion legislation and high levels of unsafe abortion. In this paper two major political positions regarding abortion in Africa: a de-colonisation approach based on a homogenized view of ―culture‖, and a liberal approach based on ―choice‖ and rights are outlined. Using the Questions and Answers sessions of a United Nations event on maternal health in Africa as an exemplar of these positions, the paper argues that neither approach is emancipatory in the African context. A de-colonisation approach that uses static and homogenized understanding of ‗culture‘ risks engaging in a politics of representation that potentially silences the ―Other‖ (in this case women who terminate their pregnancies) and glosses over complexities and multiple power relations that exist on the continent. A liberal approach, premised on choice and reproductive rights, risks foregrounding individual women‘s agency at the expense of contextual dynamics, including the conditions that create unsupportable pregnancies. The paper argues for a grounded reproductive justice perspective that draws on the insights of the reproductive justice movement, but grounds these notions within the African philosophy of Hunhu/Ubuntu. (Afr J Reprod Health 2018; 22: 49-59).
Keywords: Hunhu/Ubuntu, choice, reproductive justice, agency, women
Link to pdf : 1424-4530-1-PB